tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093829087878022434.post1276558482019515692..comments2007-11-13T09:54:35.274+10:00Tomasnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093829087878022434.post-74921595694462844082007-11-13T09:54:35.274+10:002007-11-13T09:54:35.274+10:00Not sure I follow - why would the WB 'advise' on so many layers of bureaucracy? Surely they would insist that less bureacracy and not more is the answer to greater productivity? I have seen this institutional guidance applied correctly in the SE Asian countries. Some bureaucracy is of course necessary in order to secure loans + ensure an efficient regulatory environment, but this article has pointed out the need to streamline regulatory measures!Tomashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02157262542078634617noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093829087878022434.post-61399058839329162922007-11-10T03:14:46.154+10:002007-11-10T03:14:46.154+10:00Not to be too cynical, but who is advising Mali on these procedures? It sounds like something the world bank might insist on as a criteria for loans.Erniehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01769123247497155311noreply@blogger.com